Twilight in the Valley of the Nerds

Zennstrom: Internet “good” for Record Companies

October 9, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Inadvertently or not, Skype cofounder Niklas Zennstrom provided a bit of historical context today that’s worth noting.

At the European Technology Roundtable Exhibition held in Barcelona, Zennstrom was reported to have said the following:

Kazaa came five years too early, but without that and Napster we would never have seen the transformation we’re seeing in the music industry. Record companies are seeing that the Internet is good for their business, and we made that possible.

Zennstrom made it possible, as you’ll recall, because he was a cofounder, along with Janus Friis, of Kazaa, a P2P file-sharing application that, like Napster, struck fear into the hearts of recording-industry executives and forever changed how consumers, particularly the younger ones, obtained their digital entertainment.

While the architecture of YouTube is more traditional — involving plenty of servers and the consumption of enormous amounts of data-center bandwidth — than the P2P architecture of Kazaa or Skype, the consumer behavior, downloading and uploading digital content at will, is essentially the same.

There’s no question that the recording industry, as well as the television networks and the major movie studios — have come a long way in their thinking since then. They have come to realize that an accommodation must be made between the new content-distribution technologies and business models and their own insistence on being paid for copyright ownership.

What we saw today with Google’s acquisition of YouTube was a hard-earned reconciliation between new distribution mechanisms (and channels) and the entertainment industry’s evolving business philosophy. As I said in my previous post today, the Google acquisition of YouTube would not have happened if the latter wasn’t already managing to sign content-distribution agreements with major recording labels and television networks.

So perhaps Zennstrom does deserve his due, even if, as he concedes, Kazaa probably was “five years too early.”

Categories: Business models · M&A · The Media Landscape

It’s Official: Google Acquires YouTube

October 9, 2006 · Leave a Comment

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Google officially has announced its acquisition of YouTube. The WSJ also provides a link to Google’s press release announcing the deal, though you can find that document on Google’s website, too.

More than a week ago, Mark Cuban might have been correct in his assessment, if brusque in his tone, that "anyone who buys YouTube is a moron." That was before YouTube struck critical content distribution deals with CBS, Vivendi’s Universal Music Group, and Sony BMG Music Entertainment, all of which came less than a month after YouTube reached a deal with Warner Music Group Corp.

The threat of copyright-infringement lawsuits against YouTube wasn’t completely eliminated by those agreements, but it was significantly mitigated. Those deals officially constitute a trend, a harbinger of future deals that a Google-owned YouTube ought to be able to strike with other major content and copyright holders.

Make no mistake, those deals are absolutely necessary. Although YouTube is referred to as a site that features "user-generated content," that’s a misnomer. What YouTube actually features, overwhelmingly, is "user-uploaded content."

The most popular material on YouTube still belongs to companies whose purpose is the for-profit generation and distribution of entertainment or information content. That is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future, and that’s why Cuban had his reservations, to say the least, about the sanity of anyone buying YouTube. It’s also why YouTube’s recent wave of content-distribution deals with major recording labels and networks has paved the way for Google to make its acquisitive move.

Now, as the dust clears and the facts settle — after an intense, if brief, period of rumor and speculation — we can see why Google made this move. The match between YouTube’s content engine and Google’s online-advertising machine always was readily apparent, but now the clouds of rampant copyright litigation have lifted to remove the one barrier that could have, and probably would have, scuttled the deal.

For $1.65 billion in stock, for Google, this was a good deal.

Categories: Google · M&A